Published in food+nutrition •eating_right •weight_loss | 0 Comments, Talk about this article »
Let’s face it: Atkins was a nightmare. The fat-free craze certainly wasn’t a picnic either. And the dozens of other diets you’ve tried in your lifetime probably didn’t end on a good note. What’s left? Lately, you may have heard whispers about controlling your weight (and your blood sugar and cholesterol levels) through a plan that focuses on foods low on the glycemic index (GI, for short). Simply put, the GI is a measure of how a particular food affects blood sugar.
Ever eat something and get hungry an hour later? It was probably a food with a high GI, such as white bread or potatoes. One slice of bread is not unlike a piece of candy—it produces a rapid rise in blood sugar that’s quickly followed by a plummet. Research suggests that in some people with a genetic predisposition, this kind of spike leads to type 2 diabetes, a condition that puts you at far greater risk for heart disease. Low-GI foods, on the other hand, trigger a gradual rise in blood sugar, which is good because constant levels help you feel full longer and may even sustain your energy levels.
While this concept has been studied for decades, recent research really highlights its promise. Scientists at Children’s Hospital in Boston put obese 18 to 35 year olds on a diet for six months. Half of the participants could eat as much as they wanted of low-GI foods, while the remainder followed a calorie-restricted low-fat diet. “Despite the fact that their total amount of food wasn’t restricted, the participants on the low-GI plan actually lost slightly more weight (about 8 percent of their body weight in all) than those on a traditional diet,” says lead researcher David Ludwig, M.D., Ph.D. “There is some evidence to suggest that dieters who follow a low-GI plan don’t experience the drastic drop in metabolism associated with other diets.”
Better still, the triglycerides (fats implicated in heart disease) of low-GI dieters dropped by about twice as much as those of the conventional group, and concentrations of a natural clot buster (helpful in heading off a heart attack) rose by about a third in the low-GI dieters but fell in those following the conventional plan.
Intrigued? Check out the GI guide, right. (Not a numbers person? See “The Simple Life.”) “I’ve got overweight teenagers eating this way without complaining,” says Dr. Ludwig. “And if they’re willing to do it with smiles on their faces—teens aren’t exactly known for being easygoing—anybody can.”
Harvard University researcher David Ludwig, M.D., Ph.D., recently instructed a group of young adults to follow a low-GI diet for weight loss. The interesting part: The participants didn’t receive a list of foods and their GI values. “One of the criticisms of following a low-glycemic index diet has been that it’s too difficult to put into practice,” says Dr. Ludwig. “But people can easily be counseled on how to follow that approach and not get so caught up in the numbers.” His five easy rules:
The glycemic index of foods ranges from undetectable levels to more than 100. “A good rule of thumb is to strive to make the bulk of your choices from foods with a glycemic index under 55,” advises Australian GI researcher Jennie Brand-Miller, Ph.D., author of The Low-Glycemic Diet Revolution: the Definitive Science-Based Weight Loss Plan. “Of course, you can eat a few high GI-foods in moderation.” Here are a few more details.
For decades, researchers at the University of Sydney in Australia have been testing the glycemic index of virtually everything we eat. Below are the results for 100 common American foods. For information on how to interpret the values, see “Making Sense of the Numbers.” Don’t see one of your favorites on the list? Search the university’s comprehensive database at www.glycemicindex.com.
(Because of their low carbohydrate content, these foods don’t produce a glycemic response when eaten.)
Low-GI Foods (6-55)
Medium-GI Foods (55-70)
High-GI Foods (more than 70)
» Advertisement «